A total out of a total tells you how it went. It cannot tell you what to fix. Every submitted attempt here is broken into 68 measured parameters across 7 groups, and every one of them is listed on this page.
1 day of full Pro-level access on a new account, no card required
Measured against the published catalog on 2026-08-13. Prasnya is independent and not affiliated with IIT Madras.
On Prasnya, a submitted attempt is broken into 68 parameters across 7 groups, and the point of all of them is to convert a score into an instruction. The overview gives the familiar figures — marks, percentage, accuracy, marks lost to negatives, time taken. Subject performance repeats that per subject, which is what turns a total into a decision about tomorrow. Time analysis asks the more useful question of where the time went: how much of it bought correct answers, how much was spent on questions you eventually left blank, and how each question compares to the time it deserved. Difficulty analysis splits every band, because losing marks on easy questions and losing them on hard ones are different problems. Attempt quality classifies each question as perfect, wasted, overtime or confused. The question journey records visit order, revisits and the questions that cost most for least. Finally every question is listed with what you chose, what it was worth and where it sits in the syllabus, and Pro adds the full worked solution beside each. The same report is returned for all 8 shapes of mock, from a full paper down to a single subtopic. Prasnya is independent and not affiliated with IIT Madras.
The report
Claiming a number and then not showing it is how these pages usually go. Here is every parameter, grouped as the report groups them — count them.
The headline read on the attempt: what you scored, what was available, and how much of what you attempted you got right.
The same read again, once per subject, which is what turns a total into a decision about what to revise tomorrow.
Not how long you took, but where the time went — and whether the time you spent bought you anything.
Every band, overall and per subject. Losing marks on easy questions and losing them on hard ones are different problems with different repairs.
The judgement layer: each question classified by what the attempt on it was actually like, overall and per subject.
How you moved through the paper. Order, revisits and the questions that cost the most for the least.
Every question in the attempt, with what you chose, what it was worth and where it sits in the syllabus. Pro adds the full worked solution beside each one.
The argument
Most analysis screens are the overview and nothing else. These four are the ones that change what you do next.
01
Every question carries an expected time. Comparing your time to it is what separates "I do not know this" from "I know this but too slowly" — two problems with completely different fixes.
02
Questions you got wrong having spent almost no time on them. A high count means you are guessing under pressure rather than reading, which no amount of extra revision repairs.
03
Questions you spent real time on and then left blank. These are the most expensive things in any paper — the full time cost with none of the marks — and they are invisible on a scorecard.
04
Attempting sixty questions at 50% accuracy and forty at 80% can produce the same score under negative marking. They are opposite problems, and only the split tells you which one you have.
05
Not the score per subject, but the marks the negatives took away. It is usually concentrated in one subject, and it is usually not the one you expect.
06
Correct, incorrect and unattempted counts in every band. Dropping easy marks is a discipline problem; dropping hard ones is a syllabus problem.
The loop
The analysis is only worth generating if the next step is smaller than the last one.
Any of the eight shapes of mock, scored under the paper's own marking scheme.
7 of them, from the overview down to the individual questions.
The weakest subjects and topics surface by name rather than as a number you have to interpret.
That topic or subtopic is its own route and its own short timed test. Repair, then re-measure.
The coverage
Analysis is not reserved for full-length papers. A fifteen-minute subtopic test returns exactly the same groups as a four-subject rehearsal, which is what makes short tests worth taking.
REPORTPAPER3 SHAPES
Qualifier mocks, previous year paper mocks and subject-wise paper mocks — each cut from a real released paper and reported on in full.
REPORTSYLLABUS5 SHAPES
Subject, week, topic and subtopic tests, plus custom tests you compose from 10 to 30 questions. Same 68 parameters, scoped to what you actually sat.
The plans
One payment for one month of access. Every new account gets 1 day of full access first, with no card required.
Rs 67/month
Subject and week wise previous year questions, filters, bookmarks and the practice surface.
Rs 129/month
Adds qualifier, previous-year, subject-wise, section and week mocks with basic analysis.
Rs 149/month
Adds topic and subtopic mocks, unlimited starts, advanced analysis and question-by-question solution review.
The questions
Start with the free day, sit any shape of test, and read what actually comes back.
Prasnya is an independent practice platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to IIT Madras. The official programme is at study.iitm.ac.in.